Unit 1 Theme: Identity
The Power of Inquiry:
Identity & Its ImpactA Unit of Study for AP Seminar
By the end of this unit, students will understand that...
- The research process is iterative and recursive; inquiry is not a linear process.
- Perspectives shape understanding. To fully understand a complex issue, one must consider multiple viewpoints.
- Effective arguments are evidence-based. The credibility and relevance of sources are crucial for a valid argument.
- Communication is intentional. The way an argument is presented affects how the audience perceives it.
- How is identity formed and expressed across different contexts (e.g., cultural, historical, personal)?
- What are the intended and unintended consequences of shaping one's identity for a specific audience?
- How do our cultural backgrounds and personal experiences influence our sense of self?
- In what ways do different platforms or media (e.g., social media, art, literature) shape how identity is perceived and communicated?
- How can we evaluate the authenticity of an identity presented in a given text or situation?
All students are expected to adhere to the AP Capstone Policy on Plagiarism and Falsification or Fabrication of Information. Adherence to this policy is critical to producing valid AP scores and is a core component of this course.
The AP Capstone Policy on Plagiarism:
A student who fails to acknowledge the source or author of any and all information or evidence taken from the work of someone else through citation, attribution or reference in the body of the work, or through a bibliographic entry, will receive a score of 0 on that particular component of the AP Seminar and/or AP Research Performance Task. In AP Seminar, a team of students that fails to properly acknowledge sources or authors on the Team Multimedia Presentation will receive a group score of 0 for that component of the Team Project and Presentation.
The AP Capstone Policy on Falsification or Fabrication:
A student who incorporates falsified or fabricated information (e.g. evidence, data, sources, and/or authors) will receive a score of 0 on that particular component of the AP Seminar and/or AP Research Performance Task. In AP Seminar, a team of students that incorporates falsified or fabricated information in the Team Multimedia Presentation will receive a group score of 0 for that component of the Team Project and Presentation.
By the end of this unit, students will be able to...
-
Question & Explore: Formulate an open-ended research question about a social media-related issue.
-
Understand & Analyze: Identify an author’s thesis, claims, and line of reasoning within a given text.
-
Evaluate Multiple Perspectives: Compare and contrast different perspectives on a social media issue.
-
Synthesize Ideas: Formulate a preliminary argument using evidence from multiple sources.
-
Team, Transform, & Transmit: Present findings clearly and coherently to a small group of peers.
-
Ethical Research Practices: Students will develop an understanding of ethical research and will be able to accurately and ethically attribute knowledge and ideas from sources using an appropriate citation style.
The Power of Inquiry:
Identity & Its ImpactA Unit of Study for AP Seminar
The main task for this unit is a collaborative "Identity & Inquiry" project, culminating in a team multimedia presentation and individual reflection. This project will serve as a low-stakes, formative assessment to prepare you for the demands of the official Performance Tasks later in the year.
Phase 1: Individual Investigation & Research
You will begin with individual research to lay the groundwork for your team's work, focusing on a specific sub-topic related to identity.
-
Research Focus: Choose a sub-topic of "identity" (e.g., cultural, historical, political, artistic) and conduct preliminary research. Your goal is to identify multiple perspectives and the context surrounding them, using a variety of sources like articles, literature, and speeches.
-
Source Log & Check-in: Maintain a research log with your sources, notes, and annotations. You will have a brief one-on-one meeting with me to discuss your research process and the evolution of your inquiry question. This is a crucial step to verify your authentic engagement with the material.
-
Individual Report: Write a report analyzing the arguments you have found. For this practice task, the report will have a scaffolded word count of 500-750 words. We will work our way up to the official 1,200-word report required for the Performance Task. Your focus should be on explaining the reasoning and evaluating the credibility of the evidence, and you must remember to cite your sources properly.
Phase 2: Collaborative Synthesis & Presentation
Following your individual work, you will be grouped into teams to synthesize your findings and prepare a collective argument.
-
Team Synthesis: Share your individual research with your team. Collaboratively identify the thematic connections and develop a single, compelling research question for your team to address.
-
Argument Construction: Develop a shared perspective and a cohesive argument that links claims and evidence from your combined research. You must also consider and explain the limitations or implications of your proposed conclusion or solution.
-
Multimedia Presentation: Create and deliver a 5-7 minute multimedia presentation to a peer audience. The presentation should be a well-organized and convincing argument, with claims clearly supported by evidence and visuals that enhance your message.
Phase 3: Oral Defense & Reflection
The project concludes with an oral defense and individual reflection on your learning and collaborative experience.
-
Oral Defense: Each student will respond to a question from the teacher about their research process, the team’s collaboration, and the choices made in constructing the final argument. Your answers should be specific and detailed.
-
Individual Reflection: Write a short reflection (250-500 words) on your experience. You should discuss your personal growth, the challenges and successes of collaboration, and how your perspective on the theme of identity evolved during this project.
All students are expected to adhere to the AP Capstone Policy on Plagiarism and Falsification or Fabrication of Information. Adherence to this policy is critical to producing valid AP scores and is a core component of this course.
AP Capstone Policy on Plagiarism and Falsification or Fabrication of Information:
Participating teachers shall inform students of the consequences of plagiarism and instruct students to ethically use and acknowledge the ideas and work of others throughout their course work. The student’s individual voice should be clearly evident, and the ideas of others must be acknowledged, attributed, and/or cited.
A student who fails to acknowledge the source or author of any and all information or evidence taken from the work of someone else through citation, attribution or reference in the body of the work, or through a bibliographic entry, will receive a score of 0 on that particular component of the AP Seminar and/or AP Research Performance Task. In AP Seminar, a team of students that fails to properly acknowledge sources or authors on the Team Multimedia Presentation will receive a group score of 0 for that component of the Team Project and Presentation.
A student who incorporates falsified or fabricated information (e.g. evidence, data, sources, and/or authors) will receive a score of 0 on that particular component of the AP Seminar and/or AP Research Performance Task. In AP Seminar, a team of students that incorporates falsified or fabricated information in the Team Multimedia Presentation will receive a group score of 0 for that component of the Team Project and Presentation.
AP Seminar Unit 1 Standards
A breakdown of the specific standards and skills this unit will address.
Official Wording | "Kid Wording" |
---|---|
Question and Explore | |
Ask and Investigate | |
LO 1.1A: Contextualizing and identifying the complexities of a problem or issue. | Figure out a problem and explain why it's complicated and important. |
LO 1.1B: Posing questions and seeking out answers that reflect multiple, divergent, or contradictory perspectives. | Ask a question that has more than one side to the story, so you can see different viewpoints. |
LO 1.3A: Accessing and managing information using effective strategies. | Know how to find and organize the information you need, so you're not overwhelmed. |
LO 1.4A: Evaluating the relevance and credibility of the source of information and data in relation to the inquiry. | Figure out if a source is trustworthy and if the information is actually useful for your project. |
Understand and Analyze | |
Read and Understand | |
LO 2.1B: Summarizing and explaining a text's main idea or aim while avoiding faulty generalizations and oversimplification. | Read a text and be able to explain the main point in your own words, without missing important details. |
LO 2.2A: Explaining and analyzing the logic and line of reasoning of an argument. | Show how a writer builds their main argument using different claims and ideas. |
Evaluate Multiple Perspectives | |
Compare Different Views | |
LO 3.1A: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting multiple perspectives on or arguments about an issue. | Look at different opinions on a topic and explain how they are alike and different. |
LO 3.2A: Evaluating objections, implications, and limitations of alternate, opposing, or competing perspectives or arguments. | Understand why other people might disagree with your view and what the weak points of your own argument are. |
Synthesize Ideas | |
Build Your Own Argument | |
LO 4.1A: Formulating a well-reasoned argument, taking the complexities of the problem or issue into consideration. | Use all the information you found to create your own clear, strong, and detailed argument. |
LO 4.3A: Attributing knowledge and ideas accurately and ethically, using an appropriate citation style. | Give credit to other people's ideas and words using the right formatting to avoid plagiarism. |
Team, Transform, and Transmit | |
Work and Present | |
LO 5.2B: Fostering a constructive team climate, resolving conflicts, and facilitating the contributions of all team members to address complex, open-ended problems. | Work well with your team to get a project done, and make sure everyone's voice is heard. |
LO 5.1A: Planning, producing, and presenting a cohesive argument, considering audience, context, and purpose. | Create a clear, organized presentation that's designed for your audience. |
LO 5.3A: Reflecting on and revising their own writing, thinking, and creative processes. | Think about what went well, what was hard, and how you can improve your work in the future. |